Evaluation of the Ecological and Social Functions of Manado City Parks: A Case Study of Taman Kesatuan Bangsa

https://doi.org/10.59810/archimane.v4i2.305

Authors

  • Risty Uswatun Hasanah Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
  • Priscilla Nelvy Gosal Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
  • Austensean Stanisiaus Lumunon Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0888-5925
  • Rexvan Leopold Podung Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado

Keywords:

City Park, Ecological, Green open space, Social, Taman Kesatuan Bangsa

Abstract

Urban parks provide ecological and social functions, but thermal comfort often becomes a limiting factor for their use in tropical climates. This study evaluates the ecological function, with a focus on microclimate regulation, and the social function of Taman Kesatuan Bangsa, Manado City. A descriptive quantitative approach was used, with field measurements in three zones (shaded, unshaded, and amphitheater) from 09:00 to 17:00. Thermal comfort was analyzed using the PMV and PPD indices, public space quality was assessed using the Public Space Index (PSI), and space use was examined through behavior mapping and a structured questionnaire distributed randomly to 50 visitors. The results show that all zones exceeded the comfort range. The mean PMV in the shaded area was 2.2 (PPD 65–94%), while the unshaded and amphitheater areas reached 3.0 (PPD 100%). The mean radiant temperature in the open area was 67.4 °C, far above that of the shaded area (37.6 °C), and the surface temperature of paving (53.7 °C) was higher than that of plants (31.1 °C). The overall PSI score was 3.42 (moderate), with meaning and identity of space as the highest dimension (4.10) and thermal and physical comfort as the lowest (2.15). About 48.1% of visitors came at midday and 62.9% stayed longer than one hour, with two-thirds of visitors aged over 45 years. The park is socially strong, but its ecological function is not yet optimal, so adding natural shade, vegetation, and cooler surface materials is needed to sustain its social function.

References

Beatley, T. 2011. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press.

Carmona, M. 2021. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge.

Emmanuel, R. 2005. An Urban Approach to Climate-Sensitive Design. Taylor & Francis.

Gehl, J. 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.

Huang et al. 2025. “Urban green space and urban heat islands.” Scientific Reports 15(1): 1021–1035.

Li et al. 2024. “Green spaces provide urban cooling globally.” Nature Communications 15(2): 401–415.

Mehta, V. 2014. “Evaluating public space.” Journal of Urban Design 19(1): 53–88.

Nieuwolt, S. 1982. Tropical Climatology: An Introduction to the Climates of the Low Latitudes. John Wiley & Sons.

Oke, T. R. 1987. Boundary Layer Climates. Routledge.

Rizki et al. 2024. “Urban green space and UHI in Jakarta.” Geoplanning Journal 11(1): 45–58.

Shashua-Bar, L. Pearlmutter, D. & Erell, E. 2010). “The influence of trees and grass on outdoor thermal comfort.” Building and Environment 45(1): 44–55.

Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces.

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Hasanah, R. U., Gosal, P. N., Lumunon, A. S., & Podung, R. L. (2026). Evaluation of the Ecological and Social Functions of Manado City Parks: A Case Study of Taman Kesatuan Bangsa. Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, 4(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.59810/archimane.v4i2.305

Issue

Section

Articles