Evaluasi Kelayakan dan Faktor Penggunaan Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang (JPO)

https://doi.org/10.59810/lejlace.v2i1.98

Authors

Keywords:

AHP analysis, Pedestrian bridge, Transportation

Abstract

The availability of pedestrian bridge facilities is very necessary for the safety of pedestrian crossings in minimizing the risk of accidents. One of the pedestrian bridge facilities in Kupang City is on Jl. Ahmad Yani District. Old town. The level of feasibility and use of this footbridge is considered inadequate so it is necessary to evaluate the feasibility and factors of use of this footbridge. The method used is the method for determining crossing facilities according to Bina Marga standards to determine the suitability of pedestrian bridge facilities and the AHP method for determining factors in the use of pedestrian bridge. The results of the pedestrian bridge’s feasibility analysis show that the facilities required according to the calculation results are a zebra crossing with school safety zone (ZoSS) equipment, whereas based on a geometric review of the pedestrian bridge the safety and comfort aspects do not meet the requirements. The results of the analysis of respondents' answers regarding factors in using pedestrian bridge showed that 89% of respondents used pedestrian bridge for trial and error reasons and 50% of respondents answered that they did not use pedestrian bridge s because of construction constraints. Using AHP analysis, the factor that most influences the use of footbridges is the comfort factor (distance from the center of activity) with a distribution weight of 50%, followed by the comfort factor (lighting) with a distribution weight of 32%, then the safety factor (roof availability) with a distribution weight of 12% and finally the safety factor (bridge construction) with a distribution weight of 6%.

Author Biographies

Stefanus Gabriel Mone, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakutas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Engelbertha Noviani Bria Seran, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Krisantus Satrio Wibowo Pedo, Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

References

Alam Syah, Doni Purnama. 2014. “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process: Sistem Rekomender Database Software.” Jurnal Informatika 1 (2): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v1i2.51.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. 1995. Tata Cara Perencanaan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Di Kawasan Perkotaan. 011/T/Bt/1. Indonesia: Direktorat Bina Teknik.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. 2018. Surat Edaran Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 02/SE/M/2018 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pemberlakukan 4 (Empat) Pedoman Bidang Jalan Dan Jembatan. 02/SE/M/20. Indonesia: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Krisantus Satrio Wibowo Pedo. 2022. “Evaluasi Pemenuhan Standar Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Pada Kawasan Kuanino Kupang.” Eternitas: Jurnal Teknik Sipil 1 (2): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.30822/eternitas.v1i2.1602.

Kurniawan, Septyanto, Handika Putra Pratama, and Masykur. 2019. “Analisis Karakteristik Penyebrangan Pejalan Kaki Pada Ruas Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kota Metro.” Jurnal Tapak 9 (November 1): 30–40.

Nadjam, Achmad, Mohamad Ferdiansyah, and Hendrik Jonathan Sitorus. 2018. “Efektivitas Dan Kepuasan Pengguna Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang (Jpo) Di Pasar Induk Kramat Jati.” Jurnal Poli-Teknologi 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.32722/pt.v17i1.1091.

Supranto, Johannes. 2013. Riset Operasi Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Edisi Ketiga. Edited by PT RajaGrafindo. Ketiga. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Yunus, Ishak, Mudiono Kasmuri, and Annisa Rizki Istiqomah. 2019. “Analisa Efektifitas Dan Kelayakan.” Bina Darma Conference on Engineering Science, 549–65.

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Mone, S. G., Seran, E. N. B., & Pedo, K. S. W. (2024). Evaluasi Kelayakan dan Faktor Penggunaan Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang (JPO). Local Engineering, 2(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.59810/lejlace.v2i1.98

Issue

Section

Articles-Civil Engineering