Kesinambungan dan Perbedaan Rumah Sumba di Dalam dan di Luar Praingu
Keywords:
Continuity, Different, Phenomenology, Praingu, Sumba houseAbstract
The Sumba house is characterized by traditional architecture on the island of Sumba, some of which have changed from their original characteristics and some others have retained their original characteristics. If you compare the Sumba houses in praingu (traditional villages) with the houses of Sumbanese people in cities or along roads that are characterized by modern or contemporary houses, the differences in characteristics are easy to see. It is different if the houses with Sumba architectural characteristics outside Praingu are compared to those inside Praingu. There are interesting things to say. They look the same, but have significant differences. This paper aims to describe the continuity and different of Sumba houses with traditional Sumba architecture in Anakalang compared to the original Sumba houses located in Praingu Galubakul. The focus of this research is to look at the continuity and differences in the form-function-meaning aspects of traditional Sumba houses within praingu and outside praingu. This research was produced through a qualitative research process based on a phenomenological-husserlian approach, using field observation and in-depth interview methods. The case is the Sumba house in Anakalang which is outside Praingu (Galubakul) and the owner is bound by Sumba culture. There is continuity and different in the Sumba house in Anakalang. Form and meaning continue to be continuous, but there is a change in the function of the building. Continuity occurs due to aspects of adherence to tradition, while changes occur in the addition of new functions, changing functions and deleting functions due to the establishment of a modern lifestyle. The religious (spiritual) aspect of the homeowners related to the Marapu belief and fear of praingu integration is a determining factor for the continuity of the form and meaning of the architecture of the Sumba house. Modern lifestyle is a determining factor in changing the center room from the status of a sacred space to a profane space.
References
Bahauddin, A., Hardono, S., Abdullah, A., & Maliki, N. Z. (2013). The Minangkabau House - A Vision of Sustainable Culture and Architecture. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 8(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V8-N4-311-324
Dewi, P. (2010). Peran Perapian dalam Rumah Tinggal Masyarakat Tengger, Studi Kasus: Desa Ngadisari - Tengger. (disertasi, tidak dipublikasikan), Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Djakfar, M. (2012). Tradisi toron etnis Madura: Memahami Pertautan agama, budaya, dan etos bisnis. El-HARAKAH (TERAKREDITASI), 14(50), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v0i0.2193
Djono, Utomo, T. P., & Subiyantoro, S. (2012). Nilai Kearifan Lokal Rumah Tradisional Jawa (The Value of Local Wisdom of Traditional Javanese Houses). Humaniora, 24(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v24i3.1369
Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2003). Perumahan dan Permukiman Tradisional Bali (Balinese Traditional Housing and Settlements). Permukiman “Natah,” 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2017.28.1.2
Geria, I. M. (2014). Kearifan Ekologis Kampung Megalitik Rindi Praiyawang, Sumba Timur (Ecological Wisdom Megalithic Kampung Rindi Praiyawang, East Sumba). Forum Arkeologi, 27(2), 89–98.
Hertzman, E. Z. (2017). Pulang Kampung (Returning Home): Circuits of Mobility from a Chinese Town in Indonesia [University of Toronto]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916553612?accountid=8554%0Ahttp://www.yidu.edu.cn/educhina/educhina.do?artifact=&svalue=Pulang+Kampung+%28Returning+Home%29%3A+Circuits+of+Mobility+from+a+Chinese+Town+in+Indonesia&stype=2&s=on%0Ahttp://pqdt.calis.edu.
Kartono, J. L. (2005). Konsep Ruang Tradisional Jawa dalam Konteks Budaya (The Concept of Javanese Traditional Spaces in a Cultural Context). Dimensi Interior, 3(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.9744/interior.3.2.
Muqoffa, M. (2005). Mengkonstruksikan Ruang Gender Pada Rumah Jawa. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 33(2), 87–93.
Nasruddin, Wikantari, R., & Harisah, A. (2014). Aspek Gender Arsitektur Rumah Adat Karampuang Di Kabupaten Sinjai, Sulawesi Selatan (Gender Aspects of Karampuang Traditional House in Sinjai Regency, South Sulawesi). Jurnal Ilmiah Seri Ilmu Teknik, 36. http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/jurnal
Nurdiah, E. A., & Hariyanto, A. D. (2013). Struktur Rangka Atap Rumah Tradisional Sumba (Roof Structure of a Traditional Sumba House). Semnas Reinterpretasi Identitas Arsitektur Nusantara, 117–124.
Purbadi, Y. D. (2010). Tata Suku dan Tata Spasial pada Arsitektur Permukiman Suku Dawan di Desa Kaenbaun di Pulau Timor (The Clans Formation and the Spatial Configuration in the Dawanese Settlement Architecture in the Kaenbaun Village on Timor Island) [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. In Disertasi. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18372.32640
Purbadi, Y. D. (2019). Arsitektur Etnis sebagai Ibu Pertiwi Arsitektur di Indonesia Kini dan Masa Depan (Ethnic Architecture as Ibu Pertiwi of Architecture in Indonesia Now and the Future). Simposium Perkembangan Arsitektur Nusantara 2.
Purbadi, Y. D. (2017). Continuity and Change dalam Arsitektur Vernakular: Kajian Fenomena Lopo di Desa Kaenbaun (Continuity and Change in Vernacular Architecture: Study of the Lopo Phenomenon in Kaenbaun Village). Seminar Nasional Riset Dan Teknologi Terapan 2017 (Ritektra 2017), 69–82.
Sardjono, A. B. (2009). Tata Ruang Rumah Tradisional Kudus (Space Design of Traditional Kudus Houses). Jurnal Arsitektur, 10.
Sarmini, Nadiroh, U., & Basriyani, A. W. (2018). The Transformation of the Dimension of the Meaning of Traditional House Joglo into a Modern House. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012168
Setiohastorahmanto, P., Soetomo, S., & Sardjono, A. B. (2018). Omah Kalang Omah Tradisi, Desa Kalang Desa Tradisi: Etnografi Tradisi Sub Etnis Jawa, Kalang (Omah Kalang Omah Tradition, Kalang Village Desa Tradisi: Ethnographic Tradition of Javanese Sub-Ethnic, Kalang). Arcade Jurnal Arsitektur, 2(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v2i2.41
Sholehah, Antariksa, Dwi Wulandari, L., & Wulandari, L. D. (2014). Tatanan Spasial Pada Bangunan Rumah Sembau Suku Bulungan di Tanjung Palas, Kalimantan Utara (Spatial Arrangement at Bulungan Tribal House Building in Tanjung Palas, North Kalimantan). Jurnal Perspektif Arsitektur, 9(1), 8–20.
Siti Norlizaiha, & Ibrahim, H. A. (2011). Struktur Ruang dan Elemen Persekitaran Rumah Melayu Tradisi Di Kelantan. Jurnal Perspektif. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Subiyantoro, S. (2011). Rumah Tradisional Joglo dalam Estetika Tradisi Jawa (Joglo Traditional House in Javanese Tradition Aesthetics). Bahasa Dan Seni, 39(1), 68–78. http://sastra.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/7_-Slamet-Subiantoro.pdf
Sumardiyanto, S., Antariksa, A., & Salura, P. (2016). Makna Ruang Publik Pada Rumah Tradisional Masyarakat Jawa Kasus Studi: Desa Jagalan Kotagede Yogyakarta. Jurnal Arsitektur NALARs, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.15.1.1-12
Suprijanto, I. (2002). Rumah Tradisional Osing: Konsep Ruang dan Bentuk Teori Ruang Pada Rumah Tradisional Jawa (Osing Traditional House: Spatial Concept and Form of Space Theory in Javanese Traditional Houses). Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 30(1), 10–20.
Tanrim, C. F., Stefani, M., Cynthia, Stefanie, W., & Wijaya, J. (2014). Sistem Struktur Rumah Adat Barat Rattenggaro. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2014, 7–12. http://temuilmiah.iplbi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TI2014-C-p007-012-Sistem-Struktur-Rumah-Adat-Barat-Rattenggaro.pdf
Published
Versions
- 2023-10-05 (2)
- 2023-04-15 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Yohanes Djarot Purbadi, B. Sumardiyanto, Vincentia Reni Vitasurya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
ARCHIMANE Journal of Architecture and Human Experience is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
