Evidence-Informed Biophilic Public Library Design for Humid-Tropical Makassar

https://doi.org/10.59810/greenplexresearch.v4i1.280

Authors

  • Suratul Annisa Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Syahriyunita Syahruddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Siti Fuadillah Alhumairah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Muh. Syarif Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Sahabuddin Latif Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Ashari Abdullah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Irnawaty Idrus Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Keywords:

biophilic architecture, public library, learning environment, humid-tropical design, research-by-design

Abstract

Public libraries in growing tropical cities need to function as inclusive civic-learning infrastructure rather than as book repositories. This study develops an evidence-informed framework for a biophilic public library and study center in Makassar, Indonesia. A research-by-design method integrated 2020–2024 demographic data, comparison of two candidate sites, humid-tropical climate conditions, activity-based spatial programming, precedent studies, and biophilic-design literature. Analysis combined descriptive statistics, compound annual growth, ordinary least-squares trend estimation, program normalization, and directional interpretation of sun, wind, potential noise exposure, and access. Potential users increased from 410,000 to 429,000, corresponding to 1.14% compound annual growth. The 2034 planning range is approximately 474,700–484,000 potential users. The selected approximately 1.6-ha site requires responses to eastern traffic exposure, western afternoon heat, high humidity, and monsoon rainfall. The 5,696 m² program assigns 70% to primary learning activities. The three-level proposal combines planted buffers, a semi-open atrium, reading stairs, flexible spaces, a shaded envelope, and mixed-mode conditioning. The resulting framework provides a traceable process for connecting user demand, climate, program, landscape, envelope, and operation within a testable design hypothesis. Environmental and behavioral performance remains subject to simulation, stakeholder review, and post-occupancy evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. International Federation of Library A, Institutions. IFLA–UNESCO public library manifesto 2022. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions; 2022.

. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota M. Kota Makassar dalam angka 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Makassar; 2024.

. Ju Y, Wang Z, Ju X, Cao B, Chen C, Lin B. Understanding occupancy patterns of university libraries in the post-pandemic era. Energy and Buildings. 2023;291.

. DeLauer V, McGill-O’Rourke A, Hayes T, Haluch A, Gordon C, Crane J, et al. The impact of natural environments and biophilic design as supportive and nurturing spaces on a residential college campus. Cogent Social Sciences. 2022;8(1).

. Kavathekar AK, Bantanur S, editors. Role of Biophilic Design in Educational Campus for Placemaking. ZEMCH International Conference; 2024.

. AlSehaimi B, Ayoub H. Implementation of biophilic design in the interior environment of University educational buildings in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture. 2025.

. Terblanche R, Khumalo D. The impact of biophilic design in university study areas on students’ productivity. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2025;19(1):230–47.

. Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2022;11(1):114–41.

. Wijesooriya N, Brambilla A, Markauskaite L. Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria. Cleaner Production Letters. 2023;4.

.Tekin BH, Izmir Tunahan G, Disci ZN, Ozer HS. Biophilic Design in the Built Environment: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions. Buildings. 2025;15(14).

.Andayu CD, Amal CA, Abdullah A, Latif S. Arsitektur kolaboratif biophilic untuk Generasi Z di kota tropis: Studi kasus Kota Makassar. Journal of Green Complex Engineering. 2025;3(1):17–24.

.Haidamous T. WILL BIOPHILIC DESIGN BECOME ANOTHER CHECKLIST? WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 260: WITPress; 2022. p. 27–35.

.Atthakorn S. Passive and Biophilic Design: Assessment of the Semi-Open Educational Atrium Buildings in the Tropics. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning. 2022;21(1).

.Gamage A, Upadhyay A, Hyde R. Exploring Bioinspired Climatic Design Strategies for a Low-Carbon Future: A Case Study of a Hot–Humid Climate in Sri Lanka. Biomimetics. 2025;10(10).

.Eşmebaşı M, Lau SK. Enhancing Adaptive Acoustic Comfort in Open-Plan Offices Through Green Window Views and Auditory Biophilic Elements. Buildings. 2026;16(11).

.Jiang Y, Li N, Yongga A, Yan W. Short-term effects of natural view and daylight from windows on thermal perception, health, and energy-saving potential. Building and Environment. 2022;208.

.Karaman GD, Avci AN. Analyzing Natural Lighting Conditions from the Perspective of Biophilic Design in Indoor Office Environments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022;1099(1).

.Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika Wilayah IVM. Data klimatologi Kota Makassar. Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika Wilayah IV Makassar; 2024.

.Pemerintah Kota M. Peraturan Daerah Kota Makassar Nomor 7 Tahun 2024 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Makassar Tahun 2024–2043. 2024.

.Perpustakaan Nasional Republik I. Peraturan Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Standar Nasional Perpustakaan Umum. 2024.

.Ilmiansah M, Latif S, Paddiyatu N, Amal CA, Amin SFA, Idrus I. Arsitektur tropis berkelanjutan untuk infrastruktur olahraga: Desain yang tanggap iklim untuk pusat pelatihan bulu tangkis di Polewali Mandar. Journal of Green Complex Engineering. 2025;2(2):55–60.

.Gray F, Downie A. Designing Thriving School Ecosystems: The Synergy of Biophilic Design, Wellbeing Science, and Systems Science. Architecture. 2024;4(3):594–612.

.Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2023;12(4):732–53.

.Juhari LH, Idrus I, Latif S. Integrasi alam dan spiritualitas: Desain pesantren inklusif berbasis biofilik untuk santri: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Wajo, Indonesia. Journal of Green Complex Engineering. 2026;3(2):59–66.

.Bianchi E, Billington SL. How much nature do we need? An exploration of dose-response relationships between indoor nature dose and building occupant well-being. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2025;134.

.Berto R, Barbiero G, Salingaros NA. Biophilic design of building façades from an Evolutionary Psychology framework: Visual Attention Software compared to Perceived Restorativeness. Visions for Sustainability. 2023;2023(19).

.Al-Kodmany K. Greenery-Covered Tall Buildings: A Review. Buildings. 2023;13(9).

.Molari M, Dominici L, Manso M, Silva CM, Comino E. A socio-ecological approach to investigate the perception of green walls in cities: A comparative analysis of case studies in Turin and Lisbon. Nature-Based Solutions. 2024;6.

.Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Implementing biophilic design in architecture through three-dimensional green spaces: Guidelines for building technologies, plant selection, and maintenance. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;92.

.Sadick AM, Kamardeen I. Enablers for accelerating biophilic design adoption in Australian buildings. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;83.

.Tabassum RR, Park J. Development of a Building Evaluation Framework for Biophilic Design in Architecture. Buildings. 2024;14(10).

.Wijesooriya N, Brambilla A, Markauskaite L. Biophilic Quality Matrix: A tool to evaluate the biophilic quality of a building during early design stage. Cleaner Production Letters. 2025;8.

.Asojo A, Hazazi F. Biophilic Design Strategies and Indoor Environmental Quality: A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2025;17(5).

.Jones RV, Fuertes A, Bilverstone PA. A repeated cross-sectional study of a biophilic building’s effects on workers’ perception of indoor environmental quality, health, well-being and productivity. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025;111.

.Lei Q, Liu S, Yuan C, Qi Y. Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Biophilic Design in the Workplace for Health and Wellbeing. Buildings. 2022;12(4).

.Altaf B, Billington SL. Biophilic Design Interventions for Indoor Environments: Exploring Nature Connectedness, Well-being, and Public Acceptance Through a Within-subjects Experiment. Environment and Behavior. 2025.

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Annisa, S., Syahruddin, S. S., Alhumairah, S. F. A., Syarif, M. S., Latif, S. L., Abdullah , A. A., & Idrus, I. (2026). Evidence-Informed Biophilic Public Library Design for Humid-Tropical Makassar. Journal of Green Complex Engineering, 4(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.59810/greenplexresearch.v4i1.280

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.